I was reminded of this scene by the news, a couple of weeks ago, that scientists have recorded hypersonic ‘clicks’ given off by plants under stress and are putting forward the theory that these noises can convey information about the condition of the plant. While the researchers concentrated on dehydrated tomato plants, there is also footage of a rather disgruntled-looking cactus wired for sound and emitting a definite clicking or popping noise.
This is not the only triffid analogy in the news; nearly ten years ago, I quoted from the book in response to a story about plants being engineered to produce omega-3 fatty acids hitherto found only in fish oils and animal products using genes from marine algae (technically neither plant nor animal). Since then, successful trials have led to the proposed feeding of the new oils to farmed fish and poultry and to the beginning of the process to approve them for for mass production for human consumption.
In Wyndham’s 1951 novel, which is starting to look alarmingly prescient, the origin of the triffids lies in the manipulation of plant DNA to produce a vegetable oil which far outperforms the best fish oils. When specimens appear worldwide, a large industry quickly springs up to exploit the benefits of this new - if somewhat problematic - crop; it is this abundance of lethal triffids on Home Counties farmland which renders the United Kingdom particularly vulnerable to the subsequent global disaster, one in which the triffids’ ability to communicate, albeit at a basic level, plays a significant role.
Bearing this in mind, it is, perhaps, a little unsettling to read that there is currently an application in place to grow GM Camelina Sativa plants which have been engineered to produce this new fish oil substitute on open-air agricultural stations in Suffolk and Hertfordshire.
What, as they say, could possibly go wrong?
As an aside, 1951 was something of a vintage year for novels, giving us not only the triffids but also ‘Foundation’, ‘The Cruel Sea’, ‘The Daughter of Time’, ‘Nightrunners of Bengal’, ‘The Catcher in the Rye’ and many others.
"What, as they say, could possibly go wrong?"
ReplyDeleteA huge plantation of super-oily plants catches fire. Or they grow like weeds by the roadside, are crushed by passing vehicles and roads become covered in an oily film.
Both entirely possible and even likely scenarios, but where is your sense of adventure? Take, for example, rats already outperforming students in studies of learning ability (though that’s not necessarily a surprise these days) and the known beneficial effects of maternal fish oil consumption on foetal cognitive development and then consider pregnant inland rats suddenly acquiring a source of seeds rich in omega-3...
Deletehttps://hbr.org/2015/01/rats-can-be-smarter-than-people
I love Day of the Triffids and I think I've watched every TV and film version of it, including a more modern one where the Triffids have been developed to create synthetic oil to stop climate change, ffs!
ReplyDeleteThe book has made it back on to my reading pile recently, and is only about three more books away (Two more Harry Potters, The Satan Bug, then that one)
As for GM foodstuffs, personally I'm all for it. The potential for good is astounding, but they've just got to explore the "What could possibly go wrong" question thoroughly, first (And try to ignore the flat Earthers who think GM is being developed to poison us all)
When I re-read that old post, I found a comment from you saying it had prompted you to buy the book - I’m delighted that it was such a success!
ReplyDeleteI agree that GM is potentially a force for good, particularly for purposes such as adding micro-nutrients and reducing the problems of deficiency, but I worry about the power of the business interests involved and about unforeseen consequences such as allergic reactions. As you say, the risks need to be fully investigated and I’m not sure the regulatory system is trustworthy enough to ensure that.
Oh wow. I'd forgot all about that. So the first time of reading would have been after that comment and the second will be in a month or two :-)
DeleteI think I'd seen the film and the old BBC adaptation at that time, just not read the book, but could be wrong.
You also asked me about Extra-terrestrial Civilisations in that post. I've read that one twice now, and still have it
"...the risks need to be fully investigated and I’m not sure the regulatory system is trustworthy enough to ensure that."
DeleteWe've seen how efficacious it is when there's a panic on, with the covid vaccine, haven't we?
Here’s hoping we never see a panic over GM. I wonder whether there’s any regulatory body in the UK at the moment which is entirely honest, reliable and effective.
DeleteBucko, I’m glad you like the Asimov - like Wyndham’s novels, it definitely bears multiple readings.
DeleteRattling vegetables? You been watching PMQs again?
ReplyDeleteDefinitely rattling - and viciously venomous too...
Delete